More
    Home News The 2015 INHDR conference: Evaluating the unintended effects of anti-doping

    The 2015 INHDR conference: Evaluating the unintended effects of anti-doping

    0

    inhdr2015

    On the 27th and 28th of August 2015 members of the International Network of Humanistic Doping Research assembled in Aarhus, Denmark for the 6th International INHDR conference. Under the conference theme “Evaluating the unintended effects of anti-doping”, seven keynote speakers were invited to present their research, views, and experiences. Also, the 2015 conference had a record number of abstract submissions, of which most were of very high quality, proving how vibrant a scholarly environment doping research is 15 years after the formation of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

    The conference report below is open access.

    The 2015 INHDR conference: Evaluating the unintended effects of anti-doping
    John Gleaves, Ask Vest Christiansen

    Here follows a list of the titles and authors of all the presentations at the conference. There are no freebies available, each presentation abstract costs $31.50. Buy them here! Of course, there is also the possibility to contact the presenter personally, and maybe get to read the whole paper!

    No intention to cheat: Coping with unintentional Anti-Doping Rule Violations
    Page 106
    Herman Ram
    War on drugs, war on doping? A comparative analysis and some policy recommendations
    Page 106
    Letizia Paoli
    Policy changes and unintended consequences: How history has shaped the present
    Pages 106-107
    Paul Dimeo
    Why the ban on doping is harmful
    Page 107
    Torbjörn Tännsjö
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions
    Page 107
    Verner Møller
    Judicial deference and anti-doping: Sport, arbitration and redefining the limits of law
    Pages 107-108
    David Mcardle
    The preventive effects of ignorance in Anti Doping
    Page 108
    Werner Pitsch
    Theorising unintended consequences
    Page 108
    Ivan Waddington
    Anti-doping protecting clean athletes – Who protects their privacy?
    Pages 108-109
    Nils Zurawski, Marcel Scharf
    French speaking athletes’ experience and perception regarding anti-doping control practices and therapeutic use exemptions
    Page 109
    Barbara Broers, Fanny Bourdon, Lucie Schoch, Bengt Kayser
    Anti-doping’s new way of the world – ASADA & the AFL v the Essendon Football Club
    Page 109
    Martin Hardie
    Reconceptualising the gender of fitness doping: Performing and negotiating masculinity through drug-use practices
    Pages 109-110
    Jesper Andreasson
    Underrated but not undisputed – The establishment, activities and implications of the IOC Medical Commission’s “Subcommission on Doping and Biochemistry” (1980–1988)
    Page 110
    Jörg Krieger
    Doping perception in Spanish high-school students
    Page 110
    Rodrigo Pardo
    Unintended outcomes, civilising processes and doping in cycling
    Page 111
    John Connolly
    Dying to be big: Use of oil injections for body shaping among Brazilian bodybuilders
    Page 111
    Azenildo Santos, Michael Bahrke
    Blowing the whistle: A qualitative study of student-athletes’ willingness to report doping in sport
    Pages 111-112
    Kelsey Erickson, Susan Backhouse, Dave Carless
    A system under strain? Organisational insights into the complexities and challenges of providing anti-doping education
    Page 112
    Laurie Patterson, Susan Backhouse
    Vain cheaters or victims of muscle dysmorphia? On the current status of theories explaining the use of anabolic steroids in gym environments
    Page 112
    Ask Vest Christiansen
    Effects of unintended effects: A history of the International Olympic Committee’s dealing with therapeutic use
    Page 113
    Marcel Reinold
    A critique of current anti-doping education from the perspective of university student athletes
    Page 113
    Sarah Teetzel, Charlene Weaving
    Anti-doping attempts in professional bodybuilding and their unintended effects: an examination of US case studies in the ‘90s
    Pages 113-114
    Dimitris Liokaftos
    WADA and imperialism? A philosophical look into anti-doping as a western power structure
    Page 114
    Emmanuel Macedo
    Beyond testing: Potential for race organizers as resources for health
    Page 114
    April Henning
    ‘Keep a Lid’ on the crisis: Anti-doping in Canada since 1983
    Pages 114-115
    Ian Ritchie
    Anti-doping and legitimacy; An international survey of elite athletes’ perceptions
    Page 115
    Anna Efverström, Nader Ahmadi, Åsa Bävkström, David Hoff
    Evaluating the unintended effects of anti-doping – Creating an anti-doping industry?
    Page 115
    Carsten Kraushaar Martensen
    The unintended effects of detection: How anti-doping lost its way and how it might find its way back
    Pages 115-116
    John Gleaves, Matt Englar-Carlson
    Doping in mass sport: An inexplicable phenomenon?
    Page 116
    Monika Frenger, Werner Pitsch, Eike Emrich
    Utilitarianism and anti-doping
    Page 116
    Rasmus Bysted Møller
    Blurred lines: The convolution of anti-doping in sport and national policies towards the use of performance and image enhancing drugs
    Page 117
    Kyle J.D. Mulrooney, Katinka van de Ven
    The redundancy of the concept of ‘Spirit of Sport’ in discussions on the Prohibited List
    Page 117
    Olivier de Hon
    The symbolic effect of criminal anti-doping legislation
    Pages 117-118
    Arthur Kullok
    Does anti-doping policy contribute to the development of a real doping market?
    Page 118
    Bertrand Fincoeur
    Experiences from my cycling career
    Page 118
    Michael Rasmussen
    Elite athletes’ perspectives on key elements of current anti-doping policy
    Pages 118-119
    Marie Overbye
    The justice of WADA … or lack thereof
    Page 119
    Klaas Faber

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Translate »
    @media print { @page { size: A4 !important; } }